Requiring Flood Prevention when Issuing Improvement Notices 19th June 2019 RIAMS Sponsoring the John Connell Awards 2019 12th June 2019 The Noise App New Animal Health Library Now Available 11th June 2019 RIAMS New Trainers Wanted 5th June 2019 Training Launching our new Animal Health Library at the CTSI Symposium   5th June 2019 RIAMS CIEH Noise Survey 2019 4th June 2019 The Noise App Last Chance to Book Your Place on the Improving Food Safety Conference 4th June 2019 Training Join our Mailing List for Updates Straight to Your Inbox 30th May 2019 RIAMS New RIAMS User Guides Now Available 28th May 2019 RIAMS Refresh Your Investigation Skills with RHE 23rd May 2019 Training How Can RIAMS Help with Tackling Noise Nuisance? 22nd May 2019 RIAMS Using The Noise App to Tackle Complaints 21st May 2019 The Noise App Noise Action Week Begins 21st May 2019 The Noise App New Categories Now Available on Reportable 15th May 2019 Reportable New RIAMS Now Available 14th May 2019 RIAMS Book The Must-Attend Food Conference of 2019 Now! 13th May 2019 Training Positive Social Outcomes from Citizen Reporting 10th May 2019 The Noise App New RIAMS Website Going Live Next Week 8th May 2019 RIAMS e-Learning Courses Available Through RHE 7th May 2019 Training Supreme Court Decision on Mechanically Separated Meat 2nd May 2019 RIAMS The Noise Nuisance Solution 2nd May 2019 The Noise App The New App for Accurate and Secure Reporting  1st May 2019 Reportable New Housing App Under Development  30th April 2019 RIAMS

Establishing the Meaning of ‘Knowingly Permitted’ in Waste Operation Offences

28th November 2018 RIAMS

The latest digest by Tim Everett in the Legal Digest and Enforcement community on RIAMS Communities highlights Stone and Salhouse Norwich Ltd v Environment Agency [2018] EWHC 994 (Admin).

This case concerned a company, Stone and Salhouse Norwich Ltd, and one of their Directors. They had leased the site to a third party who had proceeded to use the site to recycle mattresses, subject to a permit under the Environmental Permitting Regulations 2010.

The preliminary issue was the application to allow a late appeal by case stated on a point of law against criminal convictions; in considering this, the High Court followed the three-step test set in previous cases and ruled that while the breach was serious, there was a reason and it would be just to hear the appeal.

On the substantive issues, the High Court held that the continued storage of mattresses for recycling on a site following the operator going out of business was a waste operation for the purposes of the Environmental Permitting Regulations 2010 and 2016, as well as the Waste Framework Directive.

Following common law precedent, the High County also held that in order to convict the site owners for the offence of ‘knowingly permitting’ the operation without a permit, it was unnecessary to establish that the defendants had carried out any positive action. They only needed to prove that they knew the waste operation continued and they failed to take appropriate steps to prevent it.

To read the full digest, click here.

You must be signed into RIAMS Communities to read the full post; UK local authority employees can sign in or create an account for free.