Requiring Flood Prevention when Issuing Improvement Notices 19th June 2019 RIAMS Sponsoring the John Connell Awards 2019 12th June 2019 The Noise App New Animal Health Library Now Available 11th June 2019 RIAMS New Trainers Wanted 5th June 2019 Training Launching our new Animal Health Library at the CTSI Symposium   5th June 2019 RIAMS CIEH Noise Survey 2019 4th June 2019 The Noise App Last Chance to Book Your Place on the Improving Food Safety Conference 4th June 2019 Training Join our Mailing List for Updates Straight to Your Inbox 30th May 2019 RIAMS New RIAMS User Guides Now Available 28th May 2019 RIAMS Refresh Your Investigation Skills with RHE 23rd May 2019 Training How Can RIAMS Help with Tackling Noise Nuisance? 22nd May 2019 RIAMS Using The Noise App to Tackle Complaints 21st May 2019 The Noise App Noise Action Week Begins 21st May 2019 The Noise App New Categories Now Available on Reportable 15th May 2019 Reportable New RIAMS Now Available 14th May 2019 RIAMS Book The Must-Attend Food Conference of 2019 Now! 13th May 2019 Training Positive Social Outcomes from Citizen Reporting 10th May 2019 The Noise App New RIAMS Website Going Live Next Week 8th May 2019 RIAMS e-Learning Courses Available Through RHE 7th May 2019 Training Supreme Court Decision on Mechanically Separated Meat 2nd May 2019 RIAMS The Noise Nuisance Solution 2nd May 2019 The Noise App The New App for Accurate and Secure Reporting  1st May 2019 Reportable New Housing App Under Development  30th April 2019 RIAMS

Strict Liability Offences and Mens Rea under Welfare of Animals at the Time of Killing Regulations 2015

30th January 2019 RIAMS

Tim Everett’s latest legal and enforcement digest focuses on strict liability offences and mens rea. The case considered was R (on the application of Highbury Poultry Farm Produce Ltd) v Telford Magistrates Court and the Crown Prosecution Service [2018] EWHC 3122 (Admin).

In this case, the court was required to consider an appeal by Highbury Poultry Farm Produce Ltd against an earlier ruling. The company was charged with two offences under Regulation 30(1)(g) in relation to each of the three days due to contraventions of Articles 3(1) and 15(1) of the EU Regulation.

On the hearing at the Magistrates Court, the District Judge ruled against the preliminary points of law raised by HPFPL, holding that these offences required neither the proof of mens rea (a guilty mind) on the part of the company, nor proof of any culpability on their part. Additionally, there was some doubt over whether the company could appeal by way of case stated on a point of law or judicial review.

The High Court held that a challenge to a preliminary ruling of a lower court must be made through Judicial Review proceedings, not through an appeal by way of case stated.

The court also clarified that in order to prove offences under Regulation 30(1)(g) of the Welfare of Animals at the Time of Killing Regulations 2015 for failing to comply with the relevant Articles of Regulation (EC) No. 1099/2009 mens rea was not required. Further, under the same provisions, no culpable act or omission on the part of the operating company was necessary.

To read the full digest, click here.

You must be signed into RIAMS Communities to read the full post; UK local authority employees can sign in or create an account for free.