Scoping Public Information Document Developments 12th September 2019 RIAMS Reviewing the Caravan Licensing Event 11th September 2019 RIAMS Final Chance to Join us at the Palace of Westminster 10th September 2019 The Noise App What are you doing for World Environmental Health Day 2019? 9th September 2019 RIAMS Only One Week Left to Get Your Discount 9th September 2019 Training Welcoming our Summer Subscribers 4th September 2019 The Noise App Enter Our Prize Draw Today 3rd September 2019 RIAMS The ‘More Actions’ Menu 2nd September 2019 RIAMS Come and See us at the Caravan Site Licensing Event 29th August 2019 RIAMS Register your Interest Today: SRS Webinars Coming Soon 29th August 2019 RIAMS Book Your Place at one of our RIAMS User Groups 28th August 2019 RIAMS Making a Destruction Order under the Dangerous Dogs Act 1991 27th August 2019 RIAMS How to Add and Remove Users on Your Account 27th August 2019 RIAMS Get the Latest - RRO’s, Improvement and Prohibition Notices 22nd August 2019 RIAMS Last Chance to Get Your 10% Discount on RIAMS Training 21st August 2019 RIAMS Book Now to Get Your Early-Bird Discount 21st August 2019 Training Times Running out to Join us at the Houses of Parliament 20th August 2019 The Noise App How to Add Favourites and Use Shared Favourites 20th August 2019 RIAMS Upcoming Training Courses with RHE 20th August 2019 Training Did you speak to us at the CIH NI Housing Festival? 14th August 2019 RIAMS How do the Public Report to You? 13th August 2019 The Noise App Kicking off our new ‘How to’ Series 12th August 2019 RIAMS Launching The Noise App in Australia 7th August 2019 The Noise App Do you Follow the Legal and Enforcement Community? 7th August 2019 RIAMS RSPH Food Safety: It’s a Risky Business 6th August 2019 Training

Making a Destruction Order under the Dangerous Dogs Act 1991

27th August 2019 RIAMS

Tim Everett’s most recent case in the Legal and Enforcement group on RIAMS Communities highlights a High Court case from earlier this year focusing on the Dangerous Dogs Act 1991.

In R (on the application of Golding) v Maidstone Crown Court and the Chief Constable of Kent Police [2019] EWHC 2029 (Admin), the Court was required to consider whether the decision of the Magistrate’s Court, which had been upheld by the Crown Court, that the dog was a pit bull-type dog and was, therefore, a prohibited breed.

The High Court made three conclusions in deciding this case; it also confirmed that when challenging a refusal by a Magistrates Court or Crown Court to state a case on a point of law when asked to do so, is to seek Judicial Review of that decision.

The High Court confirmed that
When considering whether to make a destruction order under Section 4B of the 1991 Act as amended in respect of a pit bull terrier or other specified breeds, the Court must make such an order, unless it is satisfied that the animal is not a danger to public safety.
If so satisfied then, and only then, should it consider exempting the dog and making a contingent destruction order subject to the mandatory controls required by the legislation being applied within the time given.
The approach in applying Section 4B as set out in Grant and followed by the magistrates and the Crown Court Judge, in this case, was the correct one.

You can read the full summary on this case, with Tim Everett’s comments by clicking here to access the Legal and Enforcement community. Don’t forget to click ‘Follow’.

You can also read the full legal judgment here.